So I just joined a new online community (new to me anyway) called Fan IQ. I have never really been a sports fan, but it seemed interesting when I got the invite. I’ve since invited some friends of mine to join and a few did. I guess it’ll be just another way to keep in touch. Anyway, moving on to the point of this post: A fellow Fan member, %100 InjuryRate, wrote an excellent article titled “Time To Ask A Serious Question. Who’s Worse: Vick Or Stallworth?”.
(http://www.faniq.com/blog/Donte-Stallworth-or-Michael-Vick-Who-Is-Worse-Blog-25736#comments)
After reading the article, I thought about the question and what I personally thought was the worst of the two. I’m went with Vick on this one. When the author asked the question “is intention the key here?”, it begged to be answered YES.
No one is devaluing human life. It is precious and irreplaceable. The victim was important to someone. However, as I stated in the comment section, we cannot overlook the fact that Stallworth didnt intend to harm anyone, whereas Vick, victims’ species type aside, did.
I’d like for you readers to read the article and answer the question. Which crime is the lesser of two evils?
